Photos from the job site
Taken on my own lot. Published copies are resized, and one has handwriting blurred for privacy. Nothing else is altered. Each caption says only what the picture shows.
Slab depth before the pour
My project record
I paid for six inches under the building. This is what I measured when I was told the pad was ready for concrete.
Cracking in the slab
My project record
Photographed about five months after the pour.
The unfinished building
My project record
How far the frame got before work stopped.


Plumbing stub-ups
My project record
These pipes were standing straight before the pour, as photo P-01 shows.



What a photo can and cannot prove
The tape-measure photo shows about 4½ inches between the vapor barrier and the string line at one spot, on the day I was told the pad was ready to pour. I paid for 6. It is not a core sample, and it does not establish the thickness of the finished slab. Coring the slab would, and I intend to have that done.
A photo of a crack proves there is a crack. It does not prove why. L&G’s paperwork says all concrete cracks and that it offers no warranty. Control joints are cut so that a slab cracks along them. This crack runs across the panel and through the joint instead. My opinion is that it is more than I should have to accept on a $48,199 concrete job. An engineer’s report would be evidence. If I commission one it will be posted here in full, whatever it concludes.
The plumbing photos show pipes that are leaning, scuffed and gouged, with tire tread marks on the slab around them. The pre-pour photo shows the stub-ups standing straight. I contend the damage happened during L&G’s installation work. The photos cannot show who was at the controls.


